![]() My solution so far was asking peops in school if they have any spare hdds or ssd to which everyone either says what's an hdd/ssd or that they don't own one, but once the rich kid in the class was like yo' my parents got like 8 space flash drives if you need storage, to which I was like "oh cool how much?" then he said 128 gigs across all of them and just handed them to me, when I said "I meant the price, not capacity" he just said "why do you think I said they're spare? just take 'em m8". They will compress the pictures themselves and not buy the storage because 'it's a waste of money' and 'the economy is bad right now' which seeing from the drastic price spike in all of hardware in a few kilometers of our house will only get worse with time. he will explain that its good to buy another disk because eventually you will run out, they will ask for a way to "temporarily" increase the space and he will show off compression. ![]() + they have a tech savvy friend who they call for technical problem(which would be the lack of storage in this case). That won't work, they know I have the power to make space. If you see a net reduction in image size, take a really close look if it doesn't severely distort many photos. Either the PNG compression is lossless and makes absolutely no difference compared to going directly to JPEG, or it is lossy and you end up with a photo that has artifacts from two compression algorithms instead of just one. For instance, fine details might be lost or distorted by lossy compression Something YouTube creators find out the hard way, when they upload a nice-looking video with rain for instance.Īlso, it makes very little sense to convert to PNG and then to JPEG. Most image compression for photos is lossy, so for professionals having the raw uncompressed photo as the baseline for further editing is important. The photos are not inefficient, they are just uncompressed. ![]() We use old cameras that are inefficient at making photos, we take camera format -> png -> jpeg -> compressor = LOT of free space.Ĭareful there: You might already have destroyed something. TL-DR: We use old cameras that are inefficient at making photos, we take camera format -> png -> jpeg -> compressor = LOT of free space. then we went to XP with better performance and all then win 7 and now Windows 10 and I AM NOT switching to 11 even after security becomes an issue, just bare bones windows system takes so little and the space management is so easy. Also it's not that 18Gb has a large difference, I have 500Gb ssd so they do make a tiny difference but that is effectively a back up for me, a hour(or two) long recording session for youtube, 18Gbs can do a lot, especially for someone who had to learn how to manage storage on a 35 Gigabite mechanical hard drive on windows vista(yes that vista). Well we take pictures in those old formats I cant get the names of to remember, they come from those old 30GB cameras that have horrible inefficiency with size to quality ratio, so just changing them to png then jpg then compressing them in winrar or 7zip makes a god damn large difference.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |